By Praful Bidwai
As
Narendra Modi chooses his team of advisers and top bureaucrats, some
commentators are appealing to him to follow proper appointment
procedures, adopt the dharma of inclusion, and “reach out” to the 69
percent of the electorate who didn’t vote for the Bharatiya Janata Party
– and especially assure Muslims that they should feel safe under him
despite the 2002 Gujarat pogrom.
These
commentators are unpardonably naïve in asking Modi to do the opposite
of what he stands for. If Modi wanted to send a message of conciliation
to Muslims, he would have long ago mourned and expressed sincere regret
for the 2002 killings. He hasn’t done so, and defiantly says there’s
nothing to apologise for: “If I’m guilty, I should be punished, but I
won’t say sorry.”
While
canvassing, he wore every type of headgear, including a Sikh turban and
an Arunachali hat with horns and petals, but pointedly, and repeatedly,
refused to don a skullcap!
The
Modi government’s moral apathy towards Muslims was even more eloquently
conveyed by the sole Muslim in the cabinet, minority affairs minister
Najma Heptullah, through her first public speech declaring that India’s
Muslims are too numerous to be a minority; that term best applies to
Parsis – India’s wealthiest and most educated community.
This
makes nonsense of the idea of protecting the rights of underprivileged
religious-minority groups against majoritarianism, the ministry’s
liberal-democratic rationale.
Modi
has shown no respect for settled democratic conventions in making
appointments. Thus, instead of choosing someone with scholarly gravitas,
interest in academic pursuits, or a deep understanding of the
challenges education faces in India, he allotted the weighty
cabinet-rank human resource development portfolio to former actress
Smriti Irani who has shown no interest in or aptitude for education, and
who filed contradictory affidavits about her educational
qualifications, which may be a criminal offence.
Worse,
Modi used the ordinance route to override the Telecom Regulatory
Authority Act, which bars the TRAI chairman from ever holding government
office. This public-interest bar – enacted, ironically, by a BJP-led
government in 2000 – is meant to prevent favouritism and promote
impartiality, and should have been respected.
Modi
was in a rush to appoint former TRAI chairman Nripendra Misra as his
principal secretary. He refused to wait for parliament to convene and
amend the act. The ordinance violates the Supreme Court judgement in a
1987 case, which says the ordinance power “is to be used to meet an
extraordinary situation and cannot be allowed to be perverted to serve
political ends”.
Misra’s
is clearly a political appointment. He is no ordinary bureaucrat. He
was until recently on the executive council of the Vivekananda
International Foundation, a well-funded Right-wing think-tank located in
Chanakyapuri, New Delhi’s diplomatic enclave.
VIF (www.vifindia.org)
is an offshoot of the Vivekananda Kendra, started in 1972 by Eknath
Ranade, former RSS general secretary. VIF played a crucial, if silent,
role in Baba Ramdev and Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption protests beginning
2011. It runs several security- and foreign policy-related and
“historical and civilisational studies” programmes.
VIF’s
website carries hysterical pro-Hindutva and ultra-nationalist articles.
One article describes US scholar Wendy Doniger as someone who delights
in “denigrating Hinduism. Most of her own and her students’
dissertations/books … have often been described as pure pornography…”
Doniger’s book on Hinduism was recently pulped – setting a nasty
precedent of successful intimidation by the RSS-sponsored Shiksha Bachao
Andolan, since carried over.
VIF’s
director is former Intelligence Bureau chief Ajit Doval, now appointed
the National Security Adviser. As I discovered during a television
debate a few years ago, Doval belongs to a school of policing that
believes “in shooting first and asking questions later – that’s the only
way to deal with terrorists”, real or imagined.
Doval
rationalises fake ‘encounter killings’ and advocates a militarist
approach towards Maoists – regardless of legality and human rights
consequences. He calls for a hard line against India’s neighbours,
including friendly Bangladesh, who he believes, are bent on subverting
India’s security.
Many
VIF leading lights discount the potential for peaceful coexistence
between India and Pakistan. India, they demand, should stop being overly
“generous” towards its neighbours in economic cooperation, trade,
visas, even water-sharing.
VIF,
with other pro-Sangh Parivar outfits such as Deendayal Research
Institute, Niti Central, Public Policy Research Centre, Friends of the
BJP, Centre for Policy Studies and Rashtriya Seva Bharati, will provide
policy inputs to Modi.
Under
their influence, we are likely to witness a well-orchestrated campaign
to shift India’s foreign, security, economic, social and cultural
policies rightwards, in keeping with Modi’s own orientation, but with
disastrous consequences.
It’s
hard to see how the feeble and demoralised parliamentary opposition can
resist this onslaught. Many regional outfits like the Samajwadi Party
buy into the BJP’s paranoid ultra-nationalist premises and hardline
approaches.
Where
does that leave the recent elections’ greatest losers – the Congress,
the Left, the BSP and the Aam Aadmi Party? The first two have suffered
their worst-ever defeats, winning respectively 44 and 12 Lok Sabha seats
(including two Left-backed independents from Kerala). The AAP, which
showed great promise in December, has come a cropper, winning only four
seats, all in Punjab.
These
parties face an existential crisis. The Congress still deludes itself
that the Gandhi family will somehow rescue it. The family refuses to own
up to its leadership failure. Yet, no one demands that the party frees
itself from this millstone and start afresh.
Unless
the Congress rebuilds its base among the Dalits, Adivasis, lower OBCs
and the urban poor, by agitating for their livelihood rights, it’s
likely to go into steep, possibly terminal, decline – especially if it
loses the coming assembly elections in Maharashtra and Haryana, as seems
likely.
The
Left’s base has been eroding everywhere, especially in its former
bastion West Bengal, where it won the same number of seats (two) as the
BJP. Its leadership should have responded to this with alacrity; several
heads should have rolled, and the Left should have returned to vigorous
mass activity instead of doing “politics from the top” based on
unstable, sterile electoral alliances.
Unless
the Left urgently corrects course, updates its programmatic
perspectives, and develops a mass-based mobilisation strategy by taking
up issues like healthcare, food security, employment, education and
defence of people’s livelihoods threatened by predatory industrial,
mining and water and power projects, it too will be doomed.
The
solution lies in radical, painfully critical introspection, abandoning
the democratic centralism organisational doctrine which prevents healthy
debate, and joining grassroots struggles. This is a tall order, but the
Left has no soft options.
As
for the AAP, it must reinvent itself not as a political party, but as a
political movement which offers new forms of participatory activity not
narrowly focused on corruption or “crony capitalism”. The AAP must
practise what it preaches – transparency, political honesty and
inner-party consultation. It’s the lack of these that aggravated the
AAP’s crisis, leading to Shazia Ilmi’s and Yogendra Yadav’s
resignations, and to Arvind Kejriwal’s discrediting as an egoistic,
unreliable leader.
The
AAP must not shy away from ideology. It must link ‘crony capitalism’ to
communal-neoliberal authoritarianism. The BJP embodies all these and is
the main enemy. Rather than concentrate excessively on the coming Delhi
Assembly elections, the AAP must join a broad-based national campaign
against neoliberal Hindutva-capitalism. That’s the way forward.
The writer, a former newspaper editor, is a researcher and rights activist based in Delhi.
Email: prafulbidwai1@yahoo.co.in
Enrolment in govt schools significantly rose post pandemic: Mizoram
education minister
-
Mizoram State Education Minister Lalchhandama Ralte said in a meeting that
enrollment in Mizoram government schools increased significantly after the
pande...
2 years ago